Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carr, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brookfield, J. F. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carr, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brookfield, J. F. Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:2260-2269 (2001)
© 2001 Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution

An Investigation of the Cause of Low Variability on the Fourth Chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster

Martin Carr, Judith R. Soloway, Thelma E. Robinson and John F. Y. Brookfield

Institute of Genetics, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, United Kingdom

The fourth chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster lacks meiotic recombination. There is also a lack of nucleotide variation on the chromosome. This lack of variation could have been caused by a recent selective sweep, by background selection, or by a combination of these two forces. It should be possible to differentiate between the two mechanisms by studying the frequencies of polymorphic sites on the chromosome: a selective sweep should have resulted in low-frequency polymorphisms, whereas higher frequency polymorphisms would indicate the action of background selection. We have analyzed retrotransposable element insertions on the fourth chromosome in 11 strains of D. melanogaster. The polymorphisms found have a range of frequencies, with the presence of some insertions with high frequencies suggesting that the lack of variation is the result of background selection. We summarize the data using two statistics: the number of sites shared by more than one of the sample of 11 chromosomes (internal sites) and the mean number of transposable element differences in presence or absence between the sampled chromosomes. Simulations indicate that a selective sweep occurring more than 15,000 (0.03N) generations ago cannot be ruled out from the number of internal sites, although the number of differences between the chromosomes suggests either background selection or a sweep occurring more than 60,000 (0.12N) generations ago. Our results show no homoplasies and are thus consistent with no recombination occurring on the chromosome. The difficulties of distinguishing between the models using polymorphism data are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
E. S. Dolgin and B. Charlesworth
The Effects of Recombination Rate on the Distribution and Abundance of Transposable Elements
Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2169 - 2177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
P. Andolfatto
Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome
Genome Res., December 1, 2007; 17(12): 1755 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
W. Wang, K. Thornton, J. J. Emerson, and M. Long
Nucleotide Variation and Recombination Along the Fourth Chromosome in Drosophila simulans
Genetics, April 1, 2004; 166(4): 1783 - 1794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.